Rig Veda and related issues
Rig Veda and related issues
Why in news:
Every now and then antiquity and knowledge content of Vedas has been speculated by many scholars and the newspapers are often publishing articles on the same. Be it a paper presented at science conference claiming aviation knowledge and Vedas or the recent controversy of its dating.
Though UPSC is not fond of asking controversial topics but it is always good to have knowledge of established facts.
Date of Rig Veda
Date of Rig Veda has always been controversial as it is the oldest surviving literary work. Generally it is put at 1900BC. Let us see how it came to that date and how experts differ on that date.
- Max Muller assigned the period 1500 BCE to 500 BCE for Rigveda Samhita.
- One of the reasons given is that beginnings of human kind cannot be earlier to 4000 B.C.E.
- Muller took particular care to ensure that the hypothetical Aryan invasion took place after the Biblical flood and he arbitrarily assigned a date of 1200 B.C to the Rig Veda, which is considered as the oldest among the four Vedas.
- Since the evidence was flimsy, he recanted his earlier assignment near the end of his life.
Aryan Invasion theory
- proposed by the British archaeologist Wheeler(early twentieth century).
- According to this theory, all the Vedas were not composed in India.
- They were composed by members of tribes, the so called Aryans, who invaded India from the Northwest, destroyed the old civilization in the Indus Valley, supposedly Dravidian, and drove out these original inhabitants to the south of India and other parts.
The ruins of this early Indus Valley civilization dated 3000 BCE to 7000BCE or earlier. By this theory the date of Rig Veda is before 3000BC. All the modern archaeologists like Shaffer declare that there is no archaeological evidence for such an invasion; the invasion is a myth propagated by historians.
Avesta and Rig Veda
- It looks like Avesta and Vedas are not related.
- According to Thapar, the date of Avesta has been controversial, but a mid-second millennium date is now being accepted. Thapar considers the Hittite-Mittani treaty(1380BC) as more archaic than the Sanskrit of Rig-Veda and hence dates Rig-Veda to be of a date closer to the language and concept of Avesta.
- Georg Fuerstein, Subhash Kak and David Frawley dismiss the dates suggested by Thapar, A. L. Basham and Max Muller. According to them, the Rig Veda mentions the river Saraswati which disappeared in 1900 BCE ,so it has to be at least eight centuries older than the Max Muller’s arbitrary date of 1200 BC.
- Vedic literature is considered older than Avestan literature by 500 – 1000 years though the dating of both is speculative.
- The Saraswati described in Rigveda is a massive river, located between Yamuna and Shutadrī (Sutlej) flowing into the ocean.
- The satellite studies indicate this river as completely dried up by the date 1750 BCE.
- The Satellite study cannot refer to the Sarasvati (Haraquiti) river in Afghanistan since it is a small river that dries up in the desert.
Thus the lower bound for the Vedic civilisation is 1750 BCE. It is more ancient than this date because Rigveda does not mention any desert; it is mentioned in the Brāhmaņa books – Shatapatha Brāhmaņa – which is at least 500-1000 years later than Rigveda Samhita.
- The knowledge of mathematics in Rigveda and related texts is another important evidence.
- Rigveda not only mentions the decimal number system for integers but also the infinity.
- It mentions in detail the spoked wheel with arbitrary number of spokes (1.164.13,14,48).
Clearly such verses would imply that these authors knew the associated mathematical properties of circle and square.
The algorithm for circling the square needed for making the spoked wheel is given in the Baudhāyana Shulba Sūtra which is the oldest of the Shulba Sūtrās, ancient mathematical texts dealing with the methods for the construction of altars(raised structure) needed in Vedic rituals and other related mathematical topics. These books are later than the Rigveda Samhita.
Even though Dutta(1930) made a detailed study of these books and showed that the theorem attributed to Pythogoras is contained in these books in a more general form, the western indologists like Keith (or Whitney earlier) did not pay much attention since they were convinced, without any proof, that all the sciences in ancient India – mathematics, astronomy etc., were borrowed from Greeks or Egyptians.
It was in 1962 that the American mathematician Seidenberg showed that, “the elements of ancient geometry found in Egypt and Babylonia stem from a ritual system of the kind found in Shulba Sūtrās.” The Shulba Sūtrās contain the algorithm for building the pyramid shaped funeral altar (smashāņa chit).
Recall that the Egyptian pyramids are used as tombs for the dead. There is no ancient Egyptian literature for the detailed construction of these pyramids. Hence it is more than likely that their source is the Shulba Sūtrās. This piece of evidence fixes the date for the Baudhāyana Shulba Sūtra which gives a lower bound date for Rigveda.
Rigveda and all other ancient books contain several statements of astronomical significance like the position of Sun in the Zodiac on the two equinoxes, vernal or spring equinox and autumn equinox.
The seventh mandala of the Rigveda records the vernal equinox in Mrigashira Constellation pointing to a date around 4000 BCE . Again several Shulba Sūtrās declare that a pole star is visible.
Since a visible pole star occurs only at certain epochs, such a citation gives a normal range of dates for that event. The astronomical dates put the dates before 4000BC.
Silver & Cotton
Again Rigveda does not mention either silver or cotton. Since the date of cotton is well established, again we get a lower bound on the Rig Vedic date.
Rigveda repeatedly refers to ancient sages and modern sages. The age associated with these ancient sages can be called as the high Rig Vedic period which is declared to be 3100 BCE or early.
The Shulba Sūtrā texts of Baudhāyana, Ashvalāyana etc., can be dated 3100-2000 BCE; 1900 BCE is the drying up of Sarasvati and the end of Vedic age.
There is no mention of Iron in Rig veda , As the iron age starts before 12th century BC. The dates have to much earlier than that.
Vedic term “ayas“, interpreted as iron. ‘Ayas’ in other Indo- European languages like Latin or German usually means copper, bronze or ore generally, not specially iron.
There is no reason to insist that in such earlier Vedic times, ‘ayas’ meant iron, particularly since other metals are not mentioned in the ‘Rig Veda’ (except gold that is much more commonly referred to than ayas).
Moreover, the ‘Atharva Veda’ and ‘Yajur Veda’ speak of different colors of ‘ayas'(such as red & black), showing that it was a generic term.
Hence it is clear that ‘ayas’ generally meant metal and not specifically iron. Moreover, the enemies of the Vedic people in the ‘Rig Veda’ also use ayas, even for making their cities, as do the Vedic people themselves. Hence there is nothing in Vedic literture to show that either the Vedic culture was an iron based culture or that there enemies were not.